In our markup paper, “The Cyclical Behavior of the Price-Cost Markup,” we re-estimated our marginal change in overtime hours using microdata from my Londitudinal Population Databse (LPD). We still find that markups are procyclical or acyclical, both unconditionally and conditional on demand shocks.

In our industry paper, “Industry Evidence on the Effects of Government Spending,” we significantly updated the theory and discussion, explored other industry characteristics associated such as unionization and concentration, and added analysis of the dynamic interactions. We now discuss how the growth of government spending across industries is correlated with technology and show how accounting for this correlation is essential for constructing a proper instrument for government demand.

Copies of either paper can be downloaded from my research page.

This paper investigates industry-level effects of government purchases in order to shed light on the transmission mechanism for government spending on the aggregate economy. We begin by highlighting the different theoretical predictions concerning the effects of government spending on industry labor market equilibrium. We then create a panel data set that matches output and labor variables to shifts in industry-specific government demand. The empirical results indicate that increases in government demand raise output and hours, but have no effect on real product wages, even over a five-year horizon. Government demand also appears to raise productivity and markups when they are measured using gross output. These results are inconsistent with standard neoclassical and New Keynesian models of government spending.

You can download a copy of the paper from the link above or on my Research page.