I posted a revised version of my paper on the cyclical bias of geographic mobility, “A Longitudinal Analysis of the Current Population Survey: Assessing the Cyclical Bias of Geographic Mobility.” You can download the paper from my research page or directly by clicking on the title. Here is the abstract:
This paper assesses the implications of geographic mobility for the measurement of U.S. labor market dynamics using the Current Population Survey (CPS). Because the CPS does not follow individuals that move, estimates may be biased if the labor market behavior of movers differs systematically from that of nonmovers. I create a new database, the Longitudinal Population Database (LPD), that utilizes all longitudinal information in the CPS to form a panel data set. I use the LPD to identify persons who move and therewith estimate a bound on the bias from geographic mobility. I find that the cyclical bias arising from geographic mobility is small. At business cycle frequencies, the difference between the separation hazard rate calculated from the entire CPS sample and from a subset that are known not to have moved never exceeds 4 percent. There is little effect of mobility on the job finding hazard rate. I conclude that geographic mobility does not significantly affect CPS labor market dynamics.